All posts by annadynamite

[HEALTH] Susan G. Komen – A Foundation for the Money, Not for the Cure

This article originally appeared at Vita di Donna on 21 April 2017 and can be read here (in Italian). Associazione Vita di Donna Onlus is a non-profit organization based out of Rome, Italy, that aims to protect women’s health and reproductive rights, headed up by Dr. Elisabetta Canitano.

2-41

I sit in traffic on a cold but sunny Friday morning, surrounded by cars, businesses, and the now-ubiquitous LED billboards. Within the last five years, these enormous, brightly-lit signs dot the American roadways with an ever-changing litany of advertisements and promotions. On this morning, where I normally wouldn’t notice these attention-demanding signs, I glance up to see an advertisement for an upcoming “Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure.”

Immediately, my mood darkens.

Susan G. Komen, the most well-known breast cancer organization in the United States, raises millions of dollars each year through a variety of channels – walking marathons and 5K runs, partnerships with corporate sponsors, and mobile app donations. Since its inception in 1982, Komen has raised close to 3 billion dollars, with almost 1 billion of that total going toward research. While these numbers seem impressive, this is only about 25-30% of their total fundraising. This is not entirely uncommon in the US with larger advocacy organizations; however, coupled with many other concerns about large Chief Executive Officer (CEO) salaries, dubious corporate partnerships, and money spent that seems to only be cycled back into the organization, the Komen name should raise several red flags for anyone considering donating to them.

Over the last few years, Komen has come under fire for how much of their annual fundraising goes toward their CEO’s salaries. At one point, Komen founder and former CEO Nancy Goodman Brinker made a top compensation of $560,896 a year, while president Elizabeth Thompson earned $606,461 – over 1 million dollars combined. While large salaries are not unusual for foundations of this nature, comparisons show that CEOs at other organizations which make more money in annual fundraising earn proportionally less.

During this time, Komen was coming under fire for canceling several of their “Race for the Cure” events amid pulling funding from Planned Parenthood (more on that in a moment). Eventually, Brinker stepped down as CEO and assumed a volunteer position in the organization, but not before taking a salary of $397,093 at the end of fiscal year 2015. In the same financial period, current president and CEO Judith Solerno made $479,858. This speaks to an overall imbalance between the people who are supposed to be served by these foundations – women who cannot afford cancer screenings or treatment, for example – and the people running the organizations.

In addition to concerns with leadership salaries, about 45% of the money raised by Komen goes toward “education programs.” It’s unclear what this encompasses aside from things like brochures and videos, but it apparently includes what most people are familiar with from Komen: awareness campaigns. In the US, October is “Breast Cancer Awareness Month,” and today it is almost impossible to be an adult anywhere in the world and not be aware of breast cancer. In October, you can buy anything and everything in various shades of pink: the ubiquitous ribbons, but also shirts, hats, shoes, purses, kitchen utensils, jewelry, pens, beauty products, household cleaning supplies, iPods, candy, duct tape, trash bins, dog pillows, watches, breakfast cereals, stuffed animals, refrigerator magnets, boxing gloves, coffee mugs, phone chargers, and much more. Most of these items are sold with just a fraction of the profits going toward anything but more awareness campaigns, creating an odd capitalist loop in which people feel good about spending money on junk because they believe the money to be going to a “worthy cause,” when the money goes toward creating more junk.

In addition to all the absurd useless items to add to your shopping cart, Komen previously partnered with US-based fast food chain Kentucky Fried Chicken, on a campaign that featured the restaurant’s famous fried chicken served in bright pink buckets. This move brought criticism from media and health outlets, who saw the collaboration as a promotion of unhealthy eating habits when obesity has been linked as a contributing cause to breast cancer.

Other specious corporate partnerships have included Ford Motor Company creating a pink-trimmed Mustang for Komen, despite studies showing a long-term link between women who work with automotive plastics being at a five times higher risk of developing breast cancer; and most bizarrely, oil drilling company Baker Hughes marketing pink Komen drill bits used for hydraulic fracturing (a method of stimulating underground oil wells, commonly called “fracking”), despite the fact that nearly one-quarter of the chemicals used during this process are known to increase the risk of cancer.

Komen has also come under fire for a 2012 decision to stop sending funds to Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening and treatment, on the advice of the foundation’s Senior Vice President of Public Policy at the time Karen Handel, a Republican politician. Handel, who was previously Secretary of State of Georgia (US), voted ‘yes’ on this decision, which eventually cost Planned Parenthood funding for 6,400 mammogram referrals and 170,000 clinical breast exams, mainly to under- and uninsured patients. The backlash was swift and with long-term effect – within a week, Komen’s board of directors reversed the decision and Handel resigned. In the year following, Komen received 22% less in contributions.

Most infuriating of all Komen’s various uses for the money they raise is the litigation they have brought over the years toward smaller organizations who use the phrase “for the/a cure” in any of their fundraising efforts. There have been more than 100 small, local, grassroots groups that have been sued by Komen for using this phrase in any marketing materials. This is even though only about 20% of Komen’s expenditures goes toward research to find a cure, and less of that goes toward funding research to finding a cause and cure for metastatic breast cancer. The hypocrisy of a foundation that actively stops other organizations from using the phrase “for the cure” when they put so little money toward finding a cure themselves is astounding.

These are not the only problems with Susan G. Komen, but these are some of the most egregious and they should be enough to give you pause before you open your wallet to give to this foundation. As with many other large-scale charitable organizations, do your research and consider donating to or volunteering for smaller, local, and/or non-profit groups who do more to help the breast cancer community create reasonable screening schedules, fund scientific research, and work toward finding a cure – instead of putting money into giant billboard advertisements, useless household clutter, dangerous corporate partnerships, and their own pockets.

vitadidonna

Please visit Vita di Donna on Facebook

[POLITICS] Texas Senate Bill 25 Would Allow Doctors to Withhold Information About Fetal Abnormalities to Patients

This article originally appeared at Vita di Donna on 31 March 2017 and can be read here (in Italian). Associazione Vita di Donna Onlus is a non-profit organization based out of Rome, Italy, that aims to protect women’s health and reproductive rights, headed up by Dr. Elisabetta Canitano. Continue reading [POLITICS] Texas Senate Bill 25 Would Allow Doctors to Withhold Information About Fetal Abnormalities to Patients

[POLITICS] The U.S. Supreme Court and the Global Gag Rule: Policy Likely to Stay in Place Throughout Trump Presidency

This article originally appeared at Vita di Donna on 15 February 2017 and can be read here (in Italian). Associazione Vita di Donna Onlus is a non-profit organization based out of Rome, Italy, that aims to protect women’s health and reproductive rights, headed up by Dr. Elisabetta Canitano. Continue reading [POLITICS] The U.S. Supreme Court and the Global Gag Rule: Policy Likely to Stay in Place Throughout Trump Presidency

Carrie Fisher (1956-2016)

I’m sitting here, at the end of a long work day (I did not take a break, except a brief retreat to the restroom, mostly just to get away from my desk but not interact with others), and I am numb. Earlier, the news broke across social media that Carrie Fisher had died. When I saw the words of the headline, I drew a sharp breath and fought the harsh sting of immediate tears, a battle I would continue to wage for the rest of the day. Burying myself in a heavy workload after a long weekend, I tried to distract myself from the creeping feeling of despair, but I kept turning back to the constant stream of posts and tweets. Some genuine, some absurd, some cringe-worthy. Every one would bring the tears again, and I would have to look away. Continue reading Carrie Fisher (1956-2016)

A Length of Rope, Revisited

rope

Last night, I had the distinct pleasure of returning to my old university for dinner with a former professor, now friend, and taking in a movie from the school’s Tuesday film series. The feature was Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope, from 1948, a minor suspense thriller based on a stage play by Patrick Hamilton. After the film, as we wandered around campus, I remembered that somewhere out there I had written a review of Rope that was somewhere between unfavorable and apathetic. I’ve since found this review, from 2010, and am sharing it here unedited, with a few updated comments (in brackets and italics throughout): Continue reading A Length of Rope, Revisited

OHMC 2016 – Shin Godzilla and a Return to Contemplation

OctoberChallenge2014-Haxan

This morning, I saw this within a post on a friend’s Facebook page: “Insegnami la gloriosa lezione che qual che volta io passo sbagliare.” Translated from Italian, it says “Teach me the glorious lesson that occasionally I can make mistakes.” I have made a mistake in not keeping up on posting about the October Horror Movie Challenge, but today I fix that by talking a little about contemplative horror, particularly in terms of Shin Godzilla (Godzilla: Resurgence). Continue reading OHMC 2016 – Shin Godzilla and a Return to Contemplation

OHMC 2016: The Warm-Up Post

OctoberChallenge2010

It’s getting to be that time of year again, the October Horror Movie Challenge. As the image above says, 31 days – 31 movies – no excuses. For those unfamiliar with the Challenge, the standard requirements are to watch 31 horror films in the month of October, with at least 16 of those films as first time views (FTVs). Some people go bigger than that, logging a hundred or more (!) films for the month, which I’ve tried and let me tell you: it was not fun. Some people just stick to the 31/16 model, which is what I tend to do these days. Continue reading OHMC 2016: The Warm-Up Post

Bro’d Trip – Magic Mike XXL

There’s a scene in Magic Mike XXL (2015, dir. Gregory Jacobs) where pretty-boy Ken (Matt Bomer) sings Bryan Adams’ “Heaven” to a neglected housewife who has just disclosed that she and her husband have not had sex with the lights on in several years. He holds her close, encouraging her to demand more in the bedroom, essentially telling her that she deserves to have her fantasies come true. It’s such a completely raw, naked (though fully-clothed) moment that I wasn’t entirely sure if I should have applauded or cried. I may have done both. As it turns out, there are several similarly surprising and heartfelt moments in this sequel to the 2012 smash hit. Continue reading Bro’d Trip – Magic Mike XXL